VÁROSI CIVIL PORTÁL

Szakirodalom

  • Alexander, J. C. (2006). The civil sphere. Oxford University Press.
  • Alscher, M., Priller, E., Ratka, S., Strachwitz, R. G. 2017. The space for civil society: Shrinking? Growing? Changing? (Opuscula #104). Berlin: Maecenata Institut.
  • Anheier, H. K. 2017. “Civil Society Challenged: Towards an Enabling Policy Environment.” Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal 11 (2017-29): http://dx.doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2017-29.10.5018/economic...
  • Anheier, H. K., Lang, M., & Toepler, S. 2019. Civil society in times of change: Shrinking, changing and expanding spaces and the need for new regulatory approaches. Economics. https://doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2019-8
  • Anheier, H. K., Toepler, S. 2019. Policy neglect: The true challenge to the nonprofit sector. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 10, 4. https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2019-0041.
  • Arató, K., & Mikecz, D. (2015). Civil társadalom, szo‐ ciális partnerek, társadalmi mozgalmak [Civil soci‐ ety, social partners, and social movements]. In A. Körösényi (Ed.), A magyar politika negyedszázad után [Hungarian politics after a quarter century] (pp. 307–331). OSIRIS
  • Baker A. et. al. 2017. Maintaining Civic Space in Backsliding Regimes – Research and Innovation Grants. Working Papers Series, USAID, University of Colorado, Boulder.
  • Bartal, Anna Mária (2005): Nonprofit elméletek, modellek, trendek. Budapest, Századvég
  • Beckman, B., Hansson, E., Sjögren, A. (eds.) 2001. Civil Society and Authoritarianism in the Third World. A Conference Book. Stockholm: Department of Political Science of Stockholm University.
  • Bíró, E. (2010): Hol is tartunk? A civil nonprofit szervezetek jogi szabályozásának problémái. Budapest, Jogismeret Alapítvány
  • Boussard, C. 2002. Civil Society and Democratization, in Ole Elgström & Goran Hyden. Development and Democracy: What Have We Learned and How? London, New York: Routledge.
  • Bullain, Nilda (2005): Átfogó jogi reformkoncepció: Lépések egy értékalapú civil jövőkép felé. Civil Szemle, 2(1), pp. 5-25.
  • Chandhoke, N. 2004. The ‘Civil’ and the ‘Political’ in Civil Society: The Case of India, in Peter Burnell & Peter Calvert (eds.), Civil Society in Democratization. London: Frank Cass.
  • Chimiak, G., Kravchenko, Z., Pape, U. 2024. Civil Society and the Spread of Authoritarianism: Institutional Pressures and CSO Responses. Voluntas 35, 221–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-024-00641-y
  • Cohen, J. L., & Arato, A. (1992). Civil society and political theory. The MIT Press
  • Crotty, J., Ljubownikow, S. 2020. Creating organisational strength from operationalising restrictions: Welfare non-profit organisations in the Russian federation. VOLUNTAS, 31, 1148–1158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00271-0.
  • Deák, I. 2024. Authoritarianism and civil society: Legal restrictions on Human Rights CSOs. Intersections. East European Journal of Society and Politics. 10, 2 (Oct. 2024), 151–170. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v10i2.1313.
  • Diamond, L. 1994. Rethinking civil society. Toward democratic consolidation. Journal of Democracy, 5(3), 4–17.
  • Eikenberry, A. M., Kluver, J. D. 2004. “The Marketization of the Nonprofit Sector: Civil Society at Risk?” Public Administration Review 64 (2): 132–40.10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00355.x
  • Ekiert, G. 2020. Civil society as a threat to democracy: Organizational bases for the populist counterrevolution in Poland. Centre for European Studies Harvard. https://issuu.com/ces.harvard/docs/ekiert_working_paper_-_2020_-_final
  • Falkenhain, M. 2020. Dividing lines: Understanding the creation and replication of fragmentations among NGOs in hybrid regimes. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00185-6.
  • Foley, M. W., Edwards, B. 1996. “The Paradox of Civil Society”. Journal of Democracy vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 38-52.  Foster, Kenneth W., 2001. “Associations in the Embrace of an Authoritarian State: State Domination of Society?” Studies in Comparative International Development vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 84-109. Frolic, Michael B., 1997. State-Led Civil Society, in Timothy Brook & Michael B. Frolic, (eds.), Civil Society in China. Armonk, N.Y.: East Gate Books.
  • Gerő, M., A. Fejős, S. Kerényi, and D. Szikra. 2023. “From Exclusion to Co-Optation: Political Opportunity Structures and Civil Society Responses in De-Democratising Hungary.” Politics & Governance 11: 16–27. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i1.5883.
  • Gerő, M., & Kerényi, S. (2020). A civil társadalom vál‐ tozó szerepei és a társadalmi integráció [The chang‐ ing roles of civil society and social integration]. In I. Kovách (Ed.), Integrációs mechanizmusok a magyar társadalomban [Mechanisms of social integration in Hungarian society] (pp. 195–230). Argumentum; Tár‐ sadalomtudományi Kutatóközpont.
  • Gerschewski, J. 2013. The three pillars of stability: Legitimation, repression, and co-optation in autocratic regimes. Democratization, 20(1), 13–38.
  • Greskovits, B. (2015) The hollowing and backsliding of democracy in East Central Europe, Global Policy, 6: 28–37.
  • Guriev, S., Treisman, D. 2019. Informational autocrats. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(4), 100–127.
  • Guriev, Sergei, Treisman, Daniel: Spin Dictators. The Changing Face of Tyranny in the 21st Century. Princeton University Press, Year, 2022.
  • Hall, J. A. (ed.) 1995. Civil Society: Theory, History, Comparison. Oxford: Polity. 
  • Hansen, M. H., Ruud, A. E. (eds.) 1996. Weak? Strong? Civil? Embedded? New Perspectives on State-Society Relations in the NonWestern World. Oslo: Centre for Development and the Environment, University of Oslo. Hansson, Eva, 2001. Challenging Authoritarianism: Civil Society and Labour Conflict in Vietnam, in Björn Beckman & Eva Hansson & Anders Sjögren, (eds.), Civil Society and Authoritarianism in the Third World. A Conference Book. Stockholm: Department of Political Science of Stockholm University. Hayness, Jeff, 1997. Democracy and Civil Society in the Third World. Politics and New Political Movements. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Hasmath, R., Hildebrandt, T., Hsu, J. Y. J. (2019), Conceptualizing government-organized non-governmental organization, Journal of Civil Society, 15(3), pp. 267-284.
  • Heurlin, C. 2010. Governing civil society: The political logic of NGO–state relations under dictatorship. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 21(2), 220–239.
  • Kákai, László (2009): Kik is vagyunk mi? Civil szervezetek Magyarországon. Pécs, Publikon Kiadó
  • Kákai, László – Sebestény, István (2012): A nonprofit szektor súlya és a gazdasági válság hatása Magyarországon Civil Szemle, 9(3), pp. 137-157.
  • Kákai, L., Glied, V. 2024. Civil Society in the Crosshairs. Political Studies 70(4/2023(70)) DOI: 10.33896/SPolit.2023.70.3
  • Kákai, László (2019): A magyar nonprofit rendszer ki- vagy átalakulása a rendszerváltástól napjainkig. Civil Szemle, 16(1), pp. 33-53.
  • Kákai, László (2020): Development or reflections of the nonprofit sector in Central and Eastern Europe and Hungary. Politics in Central Europe. The Journal of the Central European Political Science Association. 16(1S), pp. 135-158.
  • Kákai, László (2020): Kettős szorításban a magyar civil szervezetek. Pólusok, 1(2), pp. 1-30.
  • László Kakai and Agnieszka Bejma (2022): Legal and practical conditions of the functioning of the civil society organizations in Hungary and Poland. Eastern Journal of European Studies (13), pp. 99-119 (https://doi.org/10.47743/ejes-2022-si07)
  • Kaldor, M., Kostovicova, D. 2008. Global civil society and illiberal regimes. In M. Albrow, et al. (Eds.), Global civil society 2007/8: Communicative power and democracy (pp. 86–113). Los Angeles: Sage.
  • Keane, J. 1998. Civil Society: Old Images, New Visions. Stanford University Press.
  • Koesel, K., Bunce, V. 2013. Diffusion-proofing: Russian and Chinese responses to waves of popular mobilizations against authoritarian rulers. Perspective on Politics, 11(3), 753–768.
  • Korolczuk, E. 2023. Challenging civil society elites in Poland: The dynamics and strategies of civil society actors. East European Politics and Societies, 37(3), 880–902. https://doi.org/10.1177/08883254221132282
  • Krastev I., Holmes, S. 2020. The Light That Failed: Why the West Is Losing the Fight for Democracy, Pegasus Books.
  • Krastev, I. (2016) Liberalism’s failure to deliver, Journal of Democracy, 27(1): 35–38.
  • Kuti É., Marschall M. 2020. Will the “empire” strike back? The global “third sector” is on the defensive, «Civil Szemle» 2020, vol. 17, no. 1.
  • Kuti, Éva (1998): Hívjuk talán nonprofitnak.... Budapest, Nonprofit Kutatócsoport
  • Levitsky, S., Way, L. 2010. Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Levitsky, Steven, Ziblatt, Daniel: How Democracies Die. Crown, 2019.
  • Lewis, D. 2013. Civil society and the authoritarian state: Cooperation, contestation and discourse. Journal of Civil Society, 9(3), 325–340.
  • Lorch, J., Bunk, B. 2017. Using civil society as an authoritarian legitimation strategy: Algeria and Mozambique in comparative perspective. Democratization, 24(6), 987–1005.
  • Lührmann, A., Lindberg, S. I. 2019. A third wave of autocratization is here: What is new about it? Democratization, 26(7), 1095–1113. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1582029
  • Ma, J. 2023. How does an authoritarian state co-opt its social scientists studying civil society? VOLUNTAS, 34, 830–846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-022-00510-6.
  • Mati, J. M. 2020. Civil society in ‘politics’ and ‘development’ in African Hybrid Regimes: The Kenyan Case. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00211-y.
  • Mechkova, V., Luhrmann, A., & Lindberg, S. I. 2017. How much democratic backsliding? J. Democracy, 28, 162.
  • Meyer, Michael – Moder, Clara Maria – Neumayr, Michaela – Traxler, Nicole – Vandor, Peter (2017): Patterns in Civil Society in Central and Eastern Europe: A Synthesis of 16 Country Reports and an Expert Survey. In. Vandor, Peter – Traxler, Nicole – Millner Reinhard –Meyer, Michael (eds.): Civil Society in Central and Eastern Europe: Challenges and Opportunities. Vienna, Erste Stiftung Studies, pp. 12-41.
  • Móra, Veronika (2012): Az egyesülési jogról, a közhasznú jogállásról, valamint a civil szervezetek működéséről és támogatásáról szóló 2011. évi CLXXV. sz. törvény bemutatása. Civil Szemle, 9(3.), pp. 167–175.
  • Naim, Moises (2009): What is a Gongo? How government-sponsored groups masquerade as civil society. Foreign Policy, October 13. 2009
  • Putnam, Robert D. (1993): Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.         
  • Putnam, Robert D. (2000): Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Rueschemeyer, Dietrich – Stephens, Evelin H. – Stephens, John D. (1992): Capitalist developement and democracy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  • O’Donnell, G., Schmitter, P. C., 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule. Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Rutzen, D. 2015. Civil society under assault. Journal of Democracy, 26(4), 28–39.
  • Salamon, L. M., Anheier, H. K. 1998. Social Origins of Civil Society: Explaining the Nonprofit Sector Cross-Nationally. International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 213-248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022058200985.
  • Salamon, L. M., Sokolowski, W. S., Anheier, H. K. (2000): Social Origins of Civil Society: An Overview. Center for Civil Society Studies, Baltimore.
  • Salamon, L. M., Toepler, S. (2015). “Government–nonprofit Cooperation: Anomaly or Necessity?” International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 26 (6): 2155–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9651-6.
  • Salamon, L., Benevolenski, V., Jakobson, L. (2015). Penetrating the dual realities of government-nonprofit relations in Russia. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26, 2178–2214.
  • Salamon, Lester M. – Anheier, Helmut K. (1999): Szektor születik II. Budapest, Acta Civitalis Egyesület
  • Sebestény, István (2016): Fél évtized – egészen új környezetben. Kormányzati szándék és eredmény a civil szféra NER-konformizálásában. In: Antal Attila (szerk.): A civilek hatalma. A politikai tér visszafoglalása. Budapest. Demokráciakutatások Magyar Központja Alapítvány, 61–84.
  • Simsa, R. 2019. “Civil Society Capture by Early Stage Autocrats in Well-Developed Democracies – The Case of Austria.” Nonprofit Policy Forum 10 (3). https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2019-0029.
  • Spires, A., Ogawa, A. 2022. Authoritarianism and Civil Society in Asia. Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon, New York.
  • Toepler, S., Zimmer, A., Fröhlich, C. et al. 2020. The Changing Space for NGOs: Civil Society in Authoritarian and Hybrid Regimes. Voluntas 31, 649–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00240-7
  • Tysiachniouk, M., Tulaeva, S., Henry, L. A. 2018. Civil society under the law ‘on foreign agents’: NGO strategies and network transformation. Europe-Asia Studies, 70(4), 615–637.
  • Vandor P., Traxler N., Millner R., Meyer M. 2017. Civil Society in Central and Eastern Europe: Challenges and Opportunities, ERSTE Stiftung, Vienna.
  • Vandor, P., Moder, C., Neumayr, M. 2020. Nonprofit Management Context. In. The Routledge Companion to Nonprofit Management. Anheier, H.K., Toepler, S. (eds). Routledge, Taylor Francis Group, London–New York.
  • Wiktorowicz, Q. 2000. Civil society as social control: State power in Jordan. Comparative Politics, 33(1), 43–61.
  • Wilkin, P. 2018. The rise of ‘illiberal’democracy: The orbánization of Hungarian political culture. Journal of World-Systems Research, 24(1), 5–42.
  • Zakaria, F. 1997. The rise of illiberal democracy. Foreign Affairs, 76(6), 22–43.
  • Zinecker, H. 2011. Civil society in developing countries. Conceptual considerations. Journal of Conflictology, 2(1), 1–18.
  • Walzer, Michael. (1992): The Civil Society Argument, in: Mouffe, Chantal (eds.), Dimensions of Radical Democracy: Pluralism, Citizenship, Community, London: Verso, pp. 89-107.